Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id MAA06863 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:10:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzzqi27514; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:07:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA16349; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:07:16 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:07:16 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <1928.6595T576T219@mt-inc.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: johnc@mt-inc.com (John Crookshank)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Secret Stereo Imaging
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On 22-Jan-96 09:21:55, Dennis R. Harp (harp@physics.purdue.edu) Emailed:
> John Crookshank wrote:
> eJ8+IhoTAQaQCAAEAAAAAA ...
> ------------------------------------
> Call me old-fashioned (maybe just old), but I haven't had
> the time for "secret codes" for several years now. I'm quite
> certain I could locate the decoding algorithm for base 64 encoding,
> but I usually feel a wee bit rushed during my day. Now if there's
> a perfectly good reason why base 64 is preferable for explaining
> certain concepts, then by all means, let's use it. Maybe I should
> have been lecturing in base 64 all those years. Hmm. There's a
> thought. If these messages are meant for everyone on the user
> group, why don't we make them as easy as possible to read? If
> someone wants to form a special sub-group for secret messages, that
> should be no problem.
>
> Dennis Harp.
No, sorry, I'm having troubles with one of the machines I use to read
mail with, and haven't been able to track down the source of the "secret
codes" that get inserted. It has something to do with the MIME/Rich Text
settings in MS-Exchange, but none of the options I've tried get rid of that
stuff.
Funny, that stuff only shows up when it goes through the mailing list, it